9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (9) TMI 1026X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... oners. Mr. Swapnil Bangur with Mr. Vipul A. Bajpayee for the Respondents. ORDER P.C: Heard both sides. 2. In the view that we have taken, we refuse to grant any adjournment to Mr. Bangur, appearing on behalf of the respondents. Mr. Bangur wants an adjournment to check as to whether the statements made post the Attachment Order in a letter dated 1972016, copy of which is at AnnexureV, page 8 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sum of Rs. 3,41,82,926/or anything is balance. 4. In pursuance of this impugned notice at AnnexureA, page 39, the petitioners pointed out on 1972016 (AnnexureV) that the dues demanded towards service tax of Rs. 31,25,815/, interest on the same amount and interest on Rs. 3,10,57,111/though not payable, in order to have the attachment lifted, by letters of the same date, they have informed the Depa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e this Court that no amount as is now sought to be claimed is due and payable. 8. It is not as if the Revenue is remediless in as much as it can take the route of adjudication by issuing a show cause notice, giving a party like the petitioners opportunity to place its version and thereafter pass an order assigning reasons. That order, for its legality and validity, can always be tested by a highe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
