Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Stackline Systems Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax HYDERABAD-I

2015 (7) TMI 1144 - CESTAT BANGALORE

Condonation of delay - reasons for delay - Held that:- It could not be explained by the learned advocate that when the authorized signatory was with the company after offering his resignation letter firstly on 01/09/2011 and was with the appellant co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

in managing their affairs and they were not bothered about their liability and obligations under the Central Excise laws. The learned advocate has not been able to satisfactorily explain and could not give substantial justification for this long del .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e provisions of Section 35B(3) of Central Excise Act, 1944. - E/COD/25164/2013 in E/25206/2013-DB & E/Stay/25165/2013 in E/25206/2013-DB - Final Order No. 21687/2015 - Dated:- 21-7-2015 - SMT. ARCHANA WADHWA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI ASHOK KUMAR AR .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hs and 15 days in filing the appeal against the Order-in-Appeal No.89 & 90/2011 dt. 14/11/2011. Heard the learned advocate Shri V.V. Ravikumar who appeared on behalf of the applicant. 2. The learned advocate for the appellant mentions that the im .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ee, who received the order had left their organization and they were not aware of the said order and as such no such action was taken in respect of the said order; they came to know of the order when the departmental officers initiated recovery proce .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the impugned order and this employee viz. Mr. Patric Staunton had offered his resignation from the company on 01/09/2011 but the company persuaded him to stay back for sometime and Mr. Patric Staunton continued for two more months and then again on .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

er the files. In the meanwhile, it was mentioned by the learned advocate that the appellant company closed down the factory. 4. It could not be explained by the learned advocate that when the authorized signatory was with the company after offering h .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version