TMI Blog2016 (6) TMI 1137X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rvices and proper invoices not submitted, justified? - reliance placed in the decision of Shivam Exports and others vs. CCE, Jaipur, [2016 (2) TMI 259 - CESTAT NEW DELHI] and M/s. SRF Ltd. vs. CCE Jaipur [2015 (9) TMI 1281 - CESTAT NEW DELHI] - Held that: - the issue of the cases of Shivam Exports and SRF Ltd. is squarely similar to the case in hand and decision in the case apply. It was held in t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... anty : Appeal is filed against Order-in-appeal dated 04.12.2009 in terms of which Service tax refund of ₹ 57,543/- pertaining to period 01.10.2007 to 31.12.2007 under Notification No. 41/2007-ST were rejected on the following grounds. (i) Refund claim on THC charges, bills of lading charges, origin haulage charges and repo charges were rejected on the grounds that same are not covere ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|