Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Sannareddy Sudheer Kumar Versus ITO, Ward-1 (3) , Visakhapatnam

Revision u/s 263 - as per CIT(a) A.O. has completed the assessment without examining the issue of applicability of TDS provisions u/s 194C on hire charges paid by the assessee - Held that:- It is true that the issue involved in revision proceedings i.e. disallowance of hire charges u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act is covered by the special bench decision of ITAT, Visakhapatnam in the case of Merilyn Shipping & Transports Vs. ACIT ( 2012 (4) TMI 290 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM ). Although, no prejudice is cause .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessment, however, there is no revenue loss is caused to the exchequer because the issue is covered by the decision of ITAT, special bench (SB), wherein the ITAT held that no disallowance can be made u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act, on the amounts paid within the end of the financial year. Since, the assessee failed to appear before the CIT, we are of the opinion that the CIT cannot presume things which is in the minds of assessee, as such opined that CIT has rightly assumed his jurisdiction to revise .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

7-10-2016 - SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Appellant : Shri G.V.N. Hari, AR For The Respondent : Shri Aravindakshan, DR ORDER PER G. MANJUNATHA, Accountant Member: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of Principal CIT-1, Visakhapatnam dated 31.3.2016 and it pertains to the assessment year 2011-12. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual engaged in the business of transport contract, fi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

cause notice dated 18.3.2016 and asked to explain why the assessment order passed by the A.O. u/s 143(3) of the I.T. Act, dated 31.12.2013 shall not be revised under the provisions of section 263 of the Act. The Principal CIT, proposed to revise the assessment order for the reason that on examination of assessment records, certain omissions and commissions were noticed which render the assessment order erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue, in terms of section .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ow cause notice and asked to explain why the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) of the Act dated 31.12.2013 shall not be revised under the provisions of section 263 of the Act. 4. Though adequate opportunity was granted to furnish the explanations on 28.3.2016, 30.3.2016 & 31.3.2016, no explanation has been furnished for non-deduction of tax at source on sub contract payment made by the assessee. Since, the assessee failed to comply with the show cause notices, the Pr. CIT completed revision .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

de on such credits towards hire charges, the expenditure claimed to the extent of ₹ 12,05,000/- within the total hire charges debited to the P&L account ought to have been disallowed u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act, but the A.O. has failed to do so. It is evident from the record that no query at all was raised nor any clarification was sought on this issue during the assessment proceedings. The record does not also indicate that the A.O. had applied his mind to facts and materials on record t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s of ₹ 12,05,000/- claimed by the assessee and added back to the total income assessed in the assessment order u/s 143(3) of the Act dated 31.12.2013. A copy of the order giving effect to this order shall be forwarded to this office for record. Aggrieved by the CIT order, the assessee is in appeal before us. 5. The Ld. A.R. for the assessee, submitted that the assessment order passed by the A.O. u/s 143(3) of the Act, dated 31.12.2013 is not erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rther submitted that the A.O. has examined the issue, at the time of assessment by a specific questionnaire and the assessee has submitted all the details before the A.O., therefore, the CIT was not correct in coming to the conclusion that the assessment order passed by the A.O. is erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. The Ld. A.R. further submitted that the issue of disallowance of hire charges is covered by special bench decision of ITAT, Visakhapatnam in the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ities below. The Principal CIT assumed jurisdiction to revise the assessment order for the reason that the A.O. has not conducted proper enquiry before completion of assessment, thereby the assessment order passed by the A.O. u/s 143(3) of the Act dated 31.12.2013 is erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. The CIT revised the assessment order for the reason that the A.O. has completed the assessment without examining the issue of applicability of TDS provisions u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the hire charges which render the assessment order erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. 7. It is the contention of the assessee that the A.O. has examined the issue of applicability of TDS on hire charges and after satisfied with the explanations furnished by the assessee, chosen to complete the assessment by making certain adhoc disallowances different from the issue of hire charges, therefore, the CIT was not correct in holding that the A.O. has not examined .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d before the end of the relevant financial year. In the present case on hand, the assessee has paid expenditure before the end of the financial year, as such the question of applicability of TDS and consequent disallowance of amount u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act does not arise. The Principal CIT, may hold the assessment order passed by the A.O. may be erroneous, but it cannot be prejudicial to the interest of the revenue, as there is no prejudice is caused to the revenue, as the issue involved is squ .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version