TMI Blog1969 (9) TMI 121X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... order to maintain supplies and services essential to the community. 2. In the case of the detenu Durga Show in Writ Petition No. 198 of 1969, the facts given in the Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State Government show that his representation was received by the Government on 29th May, 196(sic), but it was considered and rejected by the Government on 11th August, 1969. 3. In the cas ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ernment. In none of the cases any attempt has been made in the counter affidavit to explain the delay. A delay of 16 days which is the minimum out of that ree cases is a long delay where a person is being detained without trial under a special law relating to preventive detention. This Court in its judgment dated 31st January, 1969 in Writ Petition No. 327 of 198 Sk Abdul Karim and Ors. v. State o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rs. v. The State of West Bengal 1969 S.C.D. 944. 7. Clearly, the facts mentioned above show that this requirement laid down by the Constitution has not been satisfied in the case of any of these three petitioners before us. They were entitled to receive a consideration of their representations by the State Government as expeditiously as possible which the Government failed to do, and consequent ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
