9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (11) TMI 844X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rd Mr.T.Pramodkumar Chopada, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent in all Writ Petitions. 2. The petitioner is a dealer in spices and registered on the file of the respondent under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax, 2006 [TNVAT Act] and Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 [CST Act]. In the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... their reply on 29.01.2016, enclosing Annexure-II. Though in the impugned orders, it is stated that no reply has been filed, it appears from the impugned orders, petitioner's reply along with annexures were considered and to a partial extent, the Assessing Officer has also given relief to the petitioner. This shows that the reply submitted by the petitioner dated 29.01.2016 along with annexures ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for fresh consideration. The petitioner is directed to appear in person before the Assessing Officer, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and collect all the particulars required by them, which shall be made available by the respondent and after all the particulars have been collected, the petitioner is granted fifteen days time to submit their objections ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
