Contact us   Feedback   Annual Subscription   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2015 (5) TMI 1078 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

2015 (5) TMI 1078 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT - TMI - De-freeze of bank account allegedly been done under the provisions of The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - whether this Court is to scrutinize the source of the funds and whether the action of the authorities is justified? - Held that:- We are well aware that the power of freezing is a draconian power and safe guards have to be kept in mind to check its abuse and limit its exercise. However, a balance has to be maintained be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e present case. It is trite law that the right of investigation cannot as such be trampled upon by this Court and the purpose of freezing cannot be ignored regarding the interest of the revenue also so that the proceeds of crime are not frittered away. The parties have to be given a reasonable level playing field. This cannot be achieved by permitting oral applications thus depriving the respondents an opportunity of meeting the petitioner's case in a reasonable manner. - Admittedly, under 1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed in money laundering and required for the purpose of investigation. A similar notice had also been issued to the husband of the petitioner to put in appearance apart from 43 other defendants. Normally and in the first instance, it is for the adjudicating authority to decide whether the order of freezing is to continue or not under Section 8(3) and in such circumstances, it would not be within the ambit of this Court to get into the disputed questions as to where the money lying in the fixed de .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ect the petitioner's case before the authorities or in any other proceedings. - CWP No. 21705 of 2014 (O & M) - Dated:- 19-5-2015 - S.J. VAZIFDAR AND G.S. SANDHAWALIA JJ. Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate, for the Petitioner. Mr. D.D. Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Suresh Batra, Advocate, for the Respondents. ORDER G.S. SANDHAWALIA, J. 1. In the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to de-freeze the bank account of the petitioner which has a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as disallowed the withdrawals. 2. As we mentioned above, in the writ petition, reliefs were sought of de-freezing only in respect of the petitioner's saving account No.1956915673. The respondents have de-frozen this account. This petitioner's grievance in this Writ Petition, therefore, does not survive. The Writ Petition can be disposed of on this ground alone. 3. Mr. Bansal, however, made an oral application for reliefs in addition to those sought in the writ petition. He sought the de- .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

l application for reliefs other than those that form the subject matter of the petition on a mere technicality. The nature of the reliefs sought would require detailed investigation of facts many of which are disputed. To allow such an oral application would be undesirable especially in view of the nature of this case. It would also be unfair to the respondents. They must have an opportunity of dealing with the application and the documents on affidavit. 4. As Mr. Bansal pressed the application .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

;s saving account No.1956915673. The question must be answered in the negative. The only prayer in the petition reads as under: "i) issue Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to de-freeze the bank account of the Petitioner;" Firstly, the FDRs are not even mentioned in the prayer. The bank account is referred to in the singular, not in the plural. The paragraph-2 of the petition reads as under:- "2. That the Petitioner is having regular income from rent and tailoring. The Pet .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the Petitioner." A plain reading of paragraph-2 makes it clear that the grievance is only in respect of the said saving account No.1956915673. The expression "said account", obviously, refers to that account and to no other account. It is clear, therefore, that the words "the bank account of the Petitioner" in prayer (i) of the petition refer to the said bank account referred to in paragraph-2 of the petition and to no other bank account. At the cost of repetition, the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. The said account having been de-frozen, the petitioner's grievance does not survive. The Writ Petition is liable, therefore, to be disposed of for this reason alone. As we mentioned earlier, Mr. Bansal, however, sought reliefs of de-freezing the other accounts and FDRs of the petitioner although the reliefs were not sought in respect thereof. He, however, insisted that we ought to consider the application even with respect to such assets. 8 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC at P.S. Vigilance, Chandigarh against 4 accused regarding the transfer of shop-cum-flat no. 8, Sector 20-C, Chandigarh in favour of one O.P. Mittal, who was the tenant. In the investigation, a report dated 26.10.2009 had also been filed against her husband namely Sh. Gurvinder Singh Sawhney. It was alleged that on the basis of the said FIR and police report, the respondent-Directorate initiated an investigation bearing No. ECIR/CDS0 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nexure P-5) to the Deputy Director of the Directorate to defreeze the account but no action had been taken. Accordingly, the petition came to be filed before this Court in October, 2014. 10. In the written statement filed on 12.12.2014 by the Deputy Director of the Directorate, reference was made to FIR No. 4 and it was submitted that a property of one Tara Singh, NRI had been sought to be sold in favour of the tenant Sh. O.P. Mittal and information was received from the Chandigarh police which .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as the brother of the complainant. A compromise allegedly dated 28.02.2006 had been executed on behalf of Tara Singh whereby, sum of ₹ 50,000/- had been received without any authority and Harnek Singh, who is the clerk of the husband of the petitioner had deposited a sum of ₹ 1,350/- in the Estate Office on account of dues of the property but claimed ₹ 2,11,350/- from Tara Singh by forging the challan receipt dated 10.04.2007. A further compromise dated 17.01.2009 without any a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ived the amount from Harnek Singh through cheques. The property had further been sold in favour of the tenant on the basis of the said power of attorney. In such circumstances, summons were issued to the husband of the petitioner under the provisions of Section 50 and record was called for to trace "the proceeds of the crime" under the provisions of the PMLA. The son of the tenant had also been summoned but the husband of the petitioner was not cooperating. The details were obtained fr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n issued to him but he was not appearing and seeking adjournments which were also granted to him. 11. For the interest of the revenue, the bank accounts were ordered to be frozen which were operating in Central Bank of India, Sector 18-C, Chandigarh and investigation was going on. Keeping in view the non- cooperative attitude of Sh. G.S. Sawhney, the bank was requested that all accounts be frozen. The information was taken from the respondent-bank which revealed that following accounts were with .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ere recorded, however, since only a nominal amount of ₹ 2,074/- was lying in the concerned bank in account no. 1956915673 which is the subject matter of the present writ petition the same was defreezed by the Directorate vide letter dated 04.12.2014 (Annexure R-10). However, the other FDRs of the petitioner and the saving bank account of her husband had not been de- freezed for the sake of the revenue as the matter was subject of investigation and the documents in support of the investment .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed above were frozen except the account in question. 14. Thereafter, the latest status of the investigation report dated 12.02.2015 conducted was also placed on record through the Assistant Director. It was mentioned in the report that the husband of the petitioner was not cooperating and there were 4 other bank accounts in the name of the petitioner which were not disclosed by them earlier and details had been sought. The petitioner's husband was not giving the details of the receipt of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

as per the conversation recorded with Sh. Mukesh Mittal, Advocate, who had asked the husband of the petitioner to hand over two cheques of ₹ 35 lacs and ₹ 40 lacs to one Sh. Narinder, who was the aide of said Sh. Mukesh Mittal. The allegation that the amount of money received from O.P. Mittal had been returned in the presence of persons on 15.07.2009 was denied while placing reliance upon the statement of the son of the deceased-tenant. Accordingly, it is submitted that the investig .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ating authority under PMLA within the stipulated period and show cause notice had been issued to the petitioner and 42 other connected persons to appear on 23.04.2015 which had been duly served upon the petitioner on 08.03.2015. 16. Counsel for the petitioner has very vehemently submitted that the order freezing of the bank account under Section 17(1A) of the PMLA is by an unauthorized officer since it was not issued by the Deputy Director or the Director and there were no reasons to believe tha .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

at the subsequent freezing of accounts on 14.01.2015 (Annexure P-8) by the authorized officer namely the Deputy Director would not cure the illegality committed and, therefore, the freezing order was liable to be set aside. Reference is also made to Section 20 of the PMLA to submit that beyond a period of 180 days, the amount could not be frozen. 17. Counsel for the respondent-Directorate, on the other hand, submitted that the statutory order of freezing of accounts was only passed on 14.01.2015 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t the order passed by the adjudicating authority could be challenged in appeal and, therefore, this Court would not exercise its discretion at this point of time. It was further argued that reasons had been duly recorded before the competent authority had passed the order dated 14.01.2015 and the original record was produced for perusal. 18. The second issue which arises for consideration on Mr. Bansal's oral application is whether the concerned accounts were frozen vide order dated 12.09.20 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e the adjudicating authority within the prescribed period who would then decide on the factum whether the attachment is to continue or not. 19. It is important to note that since all relevant documents were not appended with the replies, photocopies of Annexures R-3 to R-12 have been taken on record vide order dated 23.04.2015. 20. The perusal of the Annexures taken on record would thus go on to show that the first notice was issued to the husband of the petitioner on 11.07.2013 (Annexure R-3) f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

irector of the Directorate wrote to the respondent-bank regarding the bank account of the husband of the petitioner pertaining to Account No. 1370 and other relevant information which was sought under Section 54 of the PMLA. The contents of the letter to the bank reads thus:- "Sub: Statement of S.B. A/c No. 1370 (Shri Gurwinder Singh Sawhney). -reg.- An investigation is being carried out under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (15 of 2003). In this connection, y .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

21. Thereafter, letter dated 15.09.2014 (Annexure R-7) was addressed to the bank wherein, apart from account no. 1370 equivalent to new A/c. No. 1956922067, information of the joint account of the couple was also asked for by the Assistant Director. A condition was also put that no withdrawals or debits be allowed from the account/FDRs, lockers, if any without clearance from the Directorate. The relevant portion of Annexure R-7 reads as under:- "Sub: Investigation under PMLA-2002 against S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

mp; Sudeep Kaur Sawhney 1956922067 2 Shri G.S. Sawhney 1370 02. Please furnish certified copies of Account opening forms together with the documents tendered while opening the account. Transcript/statement of each of the above mentioned accounts from 01.07.2005 to till date. All bank account's statement should be certified by the authorized person and a soft copy of the same may also be provided. Similarly information/documents in respect of any other account(s) of/connected with the subject .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ers, if any, without clearance from this Directorate. 05. The same may be treated as most urgent and kindly provide the same by 19.09.2014." 22. Thereafter, the bank on 19.09.2014 (Annexure R-8), in reference to the earlier letter of the Directorate submitted details of eight accounts/FDRs which have been noticed above. The bank, however, also wrote that the accounts have been frozen as per the instructions. 23. It is also apparent that vide request dated 27.09.2014 (Annexure P-5 = Annexure .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ads as under:- "Please refer to this office letter of even no. 2497, dated 15.09.2014 on the subject case and your reply vide letter No. BR/18C CHD/2013-14, dated 19.09.2014. Following Bank A/cs and FDRs A/c have opened and operated by Shri G.S. Sawhney and his wife and Smt. S.K. Sawhney with your Branch and on the directions of this Directorate, the same have been freezed on 15.09.2014. xxx xxx table deleted xxx xxx 02. Investigation is under process. Shri G.S. Sawhney and his wife Smt. S. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tual matrix thus being clear, the arguments raised can accordingly be dealt with. 25. The challenge in the petition is only to the freezing of Account No. 1956915673 and it is relevant to mention that not a whisper was made in the writ petition that apart from this account, the petitioner had other accounts with the bank including one joint account mentioned in the table set out above in which a sum of ₹ 1,61,380/- was there along with her husband. Similarly, six FDRs in which various amou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y specific pleadings, we are not inclined to go into the said issues on the basis of the oral submissions as the Directorate has been precluded from giving a reply to the same. It is also apparent that the writ petition regarding the Account No. 1956915673 has already become infructuous in view of the letter dated 04.12.2014 and the petitioner chose not to amend her writ petition regarding the other accounts and raise the issues which now she is seeking to do orally. 26. Secondly, there is no di .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

arious dates i.e. 28.11.2014, 02.12.2014 and 03.12.2014. In pursuance of the said investigation, the record was called for from the bank. The perusal of the letter dated 12.09.2014 would only go on to show that it was a communication by the bank whereby, reference is to one letter of the Directorate bearing No. ECIR/CDS0/05/2013/2497 dated 15.09.2014 (Annexure R-7). Obviously there is a mistake regarding the date as it could not have been written on 12.09.2014 and it was only on the receipt of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ault thus, can be found if the bank had misread the letters issued by the Assistant Director or the said Officer had been under a misconception that the accounts had been frozen. It was then rightly submitted that it is settled principle that an action by an officer not authorized to pass an order cannot be held to be an order passed with jurisdiction and, therefore, the earlier orders dated 15.09.2014 and 04.12.2014 or the communication of the bank dated 12.09.2014 (Annexure P-4) cannot be said .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ot; which has changed hands, another deal of "Rs.40 lacs" was made of this property which was paid in cash. Whether the same had been returned or not and how many people were involved in the said case and in similar cases of cheating has still to be gone into. In the reasons recorded, details of 12 companies have been mentioned which are allegedly controlled by Sh. Mukesh Mittal and his associates and on the basis of the said investigation, the Deputy Director concluded that there were .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ma facie, "it is a unique case of money laundering". Thus, it is apparent that proper reasons have been recorded by the authorities while issuing the statutory order dated 14.01.2015 (Annexure P-8) wherein, the details of all the accounts have been mentioned and reference has been made to Section 17(1A) of the PMLA for the first time. 28. Admittedly, the said order has been served on the petitioner also and there is no dispute that the Deputy Director has the power to order freezing of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

tor authorised by him for the purposes of this section,] on the basis of information in his possession, has reason to believe (the reason for such belief to be recorded in writing) that any person- (i) has committed any act which constitutes money-laundering, or (ii) is in possession of any proceeds of crime involved in money laundering, or (iii) is in possession of any records relating to money-laundering, 2 [or] 3 [(iv) is in possession of any property related to crime] then, subject to the ru .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ion on such record or 4 [property, if required or] make or cause to be made extracts or copies therefrom; (e) make a note or an inventory of such record or property; (f) examine on oath any person, who is found to be in possession or control of any record or property, in respect of all matters relevant for the purposes of any investigation under this Act: 5 [Provided that no search shall be conducted unless, in relation to the scheduled offence, a report has been forwarded to a Magistrate under .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f Additional Secretary to the Government of India or equivalent being head of the office or Ministry or Department or Unit, as the case may be, or any other officer who may be authorised by the Central Government, by notification, for this purpose.] 1 [(1A) Where it is not practicable to seize such record or property, the officer authorised under sub- section (1), may make an order to freeze such property whereupon the property shall not be transferred or otherwise dealt with, except with the pr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

issuance of a freezing order] forward a copy of the reasons so recorded along with material in his possession, referred to in that sub-section, to the Adjudicating Authority in a sealed envelope, in the manner, as may be prescribed and such Adjudicating Authority shall keep such reasons and material for such period, as may be prescribed. (3) Where an authority, upon information obtained during survey under section 16, is satisfied that any evidence shall be or is likely to be concealed or tampe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ication, requesting for retention of such record or property seized under sub-section (1) or for continuation of the order of freezing served under sub- section (1A), before the Adjudicating Authority.]" 29. We are well aware that the power of freezing is a draconian power and safe guards have to be kept in mind to check its abuse and limit its exercise. However, a balance has to be maintained between the right of the citizen and the right of the investigating agency which cannot be restric .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

by this Court and the purpose of freezing cannot be ignored regarding the interest of the revenue also so that the proceeds of crime are not frittered away. The parties have to be given a reasonable level playing field. This cannot be achieved by permitting oral applications thus depriving the respondents an opportunity of meeting the petitioner's case in a reasonable manner. 30. Lastly, question arises whether this Court is to scrutinize the source of the funds and whether the action of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version