Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Andhra Pradesh Paper Mills Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Visakhapatnam

Refund claim - duty on Sub-Standard Kraft Paper mistakenly - ignorance of Notification No. 217/86-CE dated 01.031986 - time bar - whether unjust enrichment will be applicable to the refund of the duty finalized after 25.06.1999 but pertaining to the period prior to 25.06.1999? - Held that: - The issue whether unjust enrichment will be applicable to the refund of the duty finalized after 25.06.1999 but pertaining to the period prior to 25.06.1999 was held to be in favour of the assessee by the La .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

1999 and will be applicable only w.e.f. 25.06.1999 - the refund cannot be credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund enrichment. The impugned order is set aside and I hold that the appellant is eligible for sanction of refund - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. - Appeal No.E/2013/2016 - FINAL ORDER No.A/31035/2016 - Dated:- 20-10-2016 - Ms. Sulekha Beevi, C.S., Member (J) Sh. S. Thenmozhi, advocate for the appellant. Sh. Guna Ranjan, Superintendant (AR) for the respondent. [Order per: S .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

The department however issued a Show Cause Notice proposing to deny refund, Adjudication the refund sanctioning authority allowed claim to the extent of ₹ 7,05,812.57/- on the duty paid during the last six months, white at the same time rejected the balance of ₹ 29,80,997/- as being time barred. 2. Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant preferred an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). The Commissioner (Appeals) vide order No. 57/96 dated 06.06.1996 directed that the refund .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

earlier sanctioned refund claim of ₹ 29,80,997/- but at the same time ordered to transfer same to Consumer Welfare Fund on the ground that e appellant had not proved that there was no undue enrichment. The appellant filed appeal against the said order, and in the second round of litigation also vide Order-in-Appeal No. 24/2006 dated 04.01.2006, the Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the appeal filed by the appellant. The appellant approached the Tribunal, Bangalore and vide final order No, 1 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he Consumer Welfare Fund. Aggrieved by the said order the appellant appealed before the Commissioner (Appeals), who upheld the same. The appellants are thus before the Tribunal in the third round of litigation. 4. On behalf of the appellant, the Ld. Counsel MS. S Thenmozhi submitted that the Adjudicating Authority has sanctioned the refund and ordered the amount to be credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund for the reason that though the refund pertains to the period prior to 25.06.1999 Rule 9B of .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

999 pertaining to the period prior to 25.06.1999. That the proviso to sub-rule (5) has no retrospective effect. 5. On behalf of the department, Ld. the, AR Sh. Guna Ranjan reiterated the findings in the impugned order. He strongly argued that when assessment is finalized after 25.06.1999, the proviso to sub-rule (5) of Rule 9B would come into application and the appellant is bound to establish that the incidence of duty has not been passed on. Having failed to establish that the refund claim is .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

] relied upon by the Ld. Counsel for the appellant. The Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the said case observed as under: 8. After analyzing the law laid down by Supreme Court in the case of CCE, Mumbai-Il v, Allied Photographics Ltd, [2004 (166) E.L.T, 3 (S.C.)], Hon'ble High court in para of [he order in the case or Commissioner of Customs v. Hindalco Industries Ltd (supra) has held that there is distinction between making of a refund and claiming of a refund and that the amendment carried .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Central Excise Act, 1944. Even under the amendment made by Notification No, 45/99-C.E. (N.T.), dated 25-6-1999 only the procedure established under sub-section (2) of Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 has been made applicable to the refunds arising out of finalization of provisional assessments under Rule 9B of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 Accordingly the procedure regarding application of unjust enrichment to refunds on finalization of provisional assessments will be applicable to the p .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: PROCEDURE FOR SHIFTED OF FINISHED GOODS FROM AP KARNATAKA TO UP

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.

Highlight: Deduction u/s 10B - initial AY - Mere authorization to enable the Assessee to import material or export produce in the earlier date would not ipso facto tantamount to commencement of substantial activity of ‘manufacture’/’production’.

Circular: Sub:- Procedure to be followed for Import under DEEC/EPCG Scheme- reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version