2016 (12) TMI 384

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... against the impugned order. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant is located in the state of Himachal Pradesh and availed exemption under Notification 50/2003-CE dated 17.07.2006. Thereafter, an audit was conducted on 20.02.2007 & 21.02.07, it was pointed out to the appellant that although they are not entitled to avail cenvat credit on inputs service which have been used in manu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... used for the manufacture of exempted final products has been reversed by the appellant at the time of audit objection raised to them but on the other hand, the Ld. AR submits that it is to be verified this case when they have correctly reverse the cenvat credit attributable to input service used in manufacturing of final product, therefore the matter is remanded back. 5. As facts of this case ha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X