TMI Blog2016 (12) TMI 852X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Services’ stands finally concluded by the Tribunal in the case of Charanjeet Singh Khanuja Vs. CST Indore [2015 (6) TMI 585 - CESTAT NEW DELHI]. However, in the same very decision, the Tribunal has observed that since there was bonafide belief in the industry itself and in as much as two views stands held by the department itself regarding taxability of activity, longer period of limitation would ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... aside the penalty. Appeal disposed off - matter on remand. - Appeal No. ST/508/2011-CU(DB) - FINAL ORDER No. 55185/2016-CU(DB) - Dated:- 17-11-2016 - Ms. Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial) And Shri V. Padmanabhan, Member (Technical) Ms. Rinky Jain, Advocate for the Applicants Shri Sanjay Jain, DR for the Respondent Per Archana Wadhwa: After hearing both the sides, duly ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... al in the case of Charanjeet Singh Khanuja Vs. CST Indore 2016 (41) STR 213 (Tri-Del) . However, in the same very decision, the Tribunal has observed that since there was bonafide belief in the industry itself and in as much as two views stands held by the department itself regarding taxability of activity, longer period of limitation would not be available to the Revenue. As such we find that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|