TMI Blog2016 (8) TMI 1142X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... is Court. They have not been followed and applied on the specious plea that the Revenue has carried the matter in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and it is pending therein - We do not approve of such a stand of the Revenue/respondents for the simple reason that a matter being pending in the Hon’ble Supreme Court does not mean the binding effect of this Court’s order is lost or wiped out. We are ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Court on 18-7-2016 in Writ Petition No. 2810 of 2015 [M/s. Garden Silk Mills Limited v. The Union of India Others] [2016 (338) E.L.T. 670 (Bom.)]. 2. It is also covered by a Division Bench order passed in the case of the very petitioners. To our mind, therefore, the Deputy Commissioner was in complete error in not following and applying these binding judgments of this Court. They have not bee ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ision Bench judgments were pointed out and in the case of the very petitioners, the refusal to apply and follow them by the further order of 30-9-2015/8-10-2015 justifies imposition of costs. The respondents shall pay the costs, quantified at ₹ 50,000/-. The costs shall be paid within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The concerned Commissioner is at lib ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
