2016 (12) TMI 1110

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Respondents : Mrs. Hema Muralikrishnan ORDER Heard Mr.G.Derrick Sam, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan, learned Senior Panel Counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has come forward with this Writ Petition, challenging the order passed by the first respondent under the provisions of the Central Excise Act. 3. The petitioner filed an Appeal as against the o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... re suffering severe financial crises. The Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), by the impugned order directed the petitioner to pre-deposit a sum of Rs. 9,80,000/- being 50% of the CENVAT credit, which was alleged to have been wrongly availed. Challenging the same, the petitioner is before this Court. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the grounds raised before the Co .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X