2016 (12) TMI 1434

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... garbage and sweeps from SEEPZ area. The said contract was awarded to some other person and that person had outsourced the removal of garbage and sweeps from SEEPZ without any authorisation from authorities. This would indicate the appellants were undertaking the activity of removal of garbage and sweeps in unauthorised manner which itself calls for imposition of penalty on the appellant - appeal .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oods which were cleared from SEEPZ area. Appellants herein removed garbage and sweeps from SEEPZ area and subsequently recovered precious metals from such garbage. It is the case of the department that appellant is not the person who is authorised to remove such garbage from SEEPZ area, being in possession of precious metal which are liable to confiscation and liable for imposition of penalty unde .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X