Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2016 (12) TMI 1518

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ellant Shri Sourabh Singhania, C.A. for respondent ORDER Per Ramesh Nair The fact of the case is that the respondent M/s. Blue Star Limited engaged in the manufacture of Air Conditioners/Refrigeration equipment and supplying the same on self basis at site and undertaking the job of erection and installation of such Air Conditioners/Refrigeration. The respondent have adopted the value of the go .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Therefore all the elements incurred from the factory to the site i.e. freight charges is includible in the assessable value. The respondent have undervalued the goods by not including the freight charges in the value. He placed reliance on the judgment in the respondent s own case reported as Blue Star Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-VI 2006 (200) E.L.T.108 (Tri.-Mumbai) with refe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... site on self basis. Therefore at the time of clearance of the goods there is no sale, in such case the respondent have adopted the valuation under Rule 8 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000 read with Rule 11 of Central Excise Valuation Rules,2000. He submits that the Revenue has not disputed the valuation method adopted by the respondent. The department has only added freight charges on the g .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... read with Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. If we go through the valuation Rules sequentially, we find that in terms of Rule 11 most appropriately Rule 8 is applicable which prescribed the valuation of cost construction method at the rate of 115% of the cost of manufacturing. The respondent have valued the goods as per Rule 8, the computation of the value on the basis of Rule 8 was not disput .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er CAS-4. The same was checked and verified by the Asstt. Director (Cot), Central Excise, Mumbai-I was found to be correct. Accordingly the impugned order, holding that the goods had been undervalued, resulting in short payment of duty cannot be sustained and has to be set aside. In the absence of any short payment, the penalty also has to be set aside." From the above finding, we do not see any .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates