Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s. A-one Leathers Tanners and Exports Versus The Income Tax Officer, NCW 4 (1) , Chennai

Reopening of assessment - Disallowance being commission paid by the assessee to a Non-Resident Agent - Held that:- Nature of commission paid by the assessee was not proved in the absence of agreements. That apart, we find that the reopening was initiated after four years from the end of the assessment year. In the original assessment assessee had produced all details which were called by the ld. Assessing Officer. For a reopening after four years it is necessary that there should be failure on t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rounds raised by it. - Decided in favour of assessee - I.T.A. No.3061/Mds/2016 - Dated:- 25-1-2017 - SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER For The Appellant : Shri. R. Kumar, Advocate For The Respondent : Shri. Supriya Pal, IRS, JCIT. ORDER Assessee in this appeal apart from assailing validity of the reassessment pursuant to reopening done for the impugned assessment year, is also aggrieved on a disallowance of ₹ 13,55,520/- being commission paid by the assessee to a Non-Resident Agent .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sessing Officer, for failure of the assessee to produce entire vouchers. Thereafter the assessment was reopened on 20.03.2014 by issuing notice u/s.148 of the Act. In the course of such reassessment, it was noted by the ld. Assessing Officer that assessee had debited a sum of ₹ 8,24,320/- as commission payment to Non-Resident. As per ld. Assessing Officer such commission was for the purpose of sales of the assessee outside India through foreign agent and by virtue of Sec. 9(1)(vii) of the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e of the fact whether the Non-Resident concern had a place of business or business connection or any presence in India. Thus, he held that assessee had failed to deduct tax at source at the commission of ₹ 8,24,620/- paid to the Non-Resident Agent attracting the rigours of Sec. 40(a)(i) of the Act. He disallowed the claim and completed reassessment. 3. Aggrieved, the assessee moved in appeal before ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Assessee did not challenge the reopening before ld .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

,300/- , the case was selected for scrutiny and was completed u/s143(3) on 3.11.2009. The firm in its return of income filed u/s139(1) has debited a sum of ₹ 8,24,320/- with the description "In foreign currency to non-residents" on which TDS has not been deducted. The case was reopened u/s147 by issuing u/s148 to the firm and was duly acknowledged on 20.3.2014. The case was completed on 20.10.2014 determining the total income at _13,55,529/- In the said assessment the following a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

unity letter issued, Shri G.Pari CA, appeared filed the copy of additional evidences produced before CIT CA) and the case was discussed. After verification of the copy of additional evidences such as invoices copies, shipping bills, purchase orders and ledger submitted by the assessee, the remand report on the issue of foreign commission payment is submitted herein below. During the course of remand proceedings the assessee has been asked to produce the copies of agreements entered into by it wi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

on to the following person as a fixed percentage on the turnover brought by foreign agents. Sl. No Name of the Agent % of Commission paid Amount paid in USD Amount paid in INR 1 LINFOOT CO. LTD. Tiwan 5 3910.45 181000 2 LINFOOT CO. LTD. Tiwan 5 7468.00 336060 3 LINFOOT CO. LTD. Tiwan 5 6828.00 307260 During the course of remand proceedings, the assessee relief on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. in the case of M/s GE India Technology Centre P. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax. T .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

application in such cases. The assessee also relied on the decision of the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT Vs Faizan Shoes P. Ltd. (2014)367 ITR 155. The additional information firled by the assessee has been verified and it is seen the facts of the assessee's case is similar to M/s GE India Technology Centre P. Ltd. vs CIT & M/s. Faizan Shoes P. Ltd on the issue of foreign commission . Nevertheless ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) held that assessee could not pr .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ing Officer. 4. Now before me, ld. Authorised Representative strongly assailing the orders of the lower authorities submitted that ld. Assessing Officer in the remand report had specifically stated that the facts in assessee s case were similar for that of GE India Technology Centre P. Ltd vs. CIT 327 ITR 456 decided by Hon ble Apex Court and that of Faizan Shoes (P) Ltd (supra) decided by Hon ble Jurisdictional High Court. Further, according to him the re-assessment was initiated after four yea .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: PROCEDURE FOR SHIFTED OF FINISHED GOODS FROM AP KARNATAKA TO UP

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.

Highlight: Deduction u/s 10B - initial AY - Mere authorization to enable the Assessee to import material or export produce in the earlier date would not ipso facto tantamount to commencement of substantial activity of ‘manufacture’/’production’.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version