9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (1) TMI 1358X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Respondent ORDER All the three appeals are arising out of a common impugned order and hence they are taken up together for disposal. 2. Issue in dispute relates to denial of cenvat credit of Rs. 6,38,783/- (period August 2011 to June 2012) Rs. 5,29,768 (July 2012 to May 2013) and Rs. 4,40,454/- (June 2013 to May 2014). These credits were sought to be denied by the department on the ground ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... entitled to input service tax credit subject to verification of cenvatable invoices, the matter was remanded back to the adjudicating authority by Tribunal's Final Order No.41078/2016 dt. 24.6.2016. He also submitted that there is no requirement that input services are required to be used by the manufacturer in within the factory of manufacture. Ld. Counsel also submitted that only allegatio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tical matter has already been remanded to original authority in the final order referred to above. It is a fact that SCN does not cover the issue of ineligibility on account of non-registration of ISD but only for the reason that services are ineligible by virtue of Rule 2 (l) (ii) read with Rule 3 of the Rules. However, following the decision taken in the identical issue in the appellant's ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... stood in the name of appellant's another unit for the purpose of availment of credit. I also find that this Tribunal in the case of Greaves Cotton Ltd. Vs CCE vide Final Order No.40474-40476/2014 dt. 8.8.2014 allowed the appeal of the assessee, after taking into consideration the ruling of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of CCE Bangalore Vs Ecof Industries Pvt. Ltd., 2011 (271) ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
