Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1966 (2) TMI 4

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ertain transactions, of purchase of cloth from dealers in foreign countries like Japan and other countries and the sale transactions of that cloth to merchants in Aden. The modus operandi of the assessee in respect of these transactions in the assessment years was that the assessee obtained import licences for importing cloth in Aden from the Aden authorities and secured permits for making remittances of money to India,. The assessee transmitted those documents to the firm of Chhaganlal Savchand & Co. in Bombay, hereinafter for brevity's sake referred to as the Bombay firm. The Bombay firm after securing permission of the Reserve Bank of India obtained moneys from the assessee from Aden and then credited it with some bank in Bombay. On receiving instructions from the assessee as to the quantity and quality of goods, the Bombay firm placed orders directly with the manufacturers in Japan. Simultaneously, an irrevocable letter of credit was opened by the bank in Bombay with its branches in Japan in favour of the Japanese manufacturers. At times the Bombay firm did not deal directly with the manufacturers in Japan, but negotiated the purchases with the representatives of the Japanese m .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... so far as transactions in category 3 are concerned, documents were transmitted by the Bombay firm to the Aden parties and so far as transactions in category 4 are concerned, the documents were handed over by the Bombay firm at Bombay to the representatives of the Aden parties. We are not here concerned with transactions falling under categories 1 and 2. In respect of those transactions the income-tax authorities have held that operations relating to these transactions were partly carried out in India and, therefore, profit or loss attributable to them had to be taken into account. The authorities, therefore, have held that 50 per cent. of the profit or loss in respect of the said transactions should be taken into account while determining the assessee's total income. As regards transactions falling under categories 3 and 4, the Income-tax Officer held that the mere fact that the documents were finally endorsed by the assessee at Aden would not serve to hold that the sale took place there. He held that the endorsement was just a legal formality to which no part of the profits could be attributed. Accordingly the entire profits in respect of the said transactions were held by the I .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... following question of law to us : "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the sales in respect of the transactions referred to above took place in the taxable territories and the entire profit in respect thereof arose in the taxable territories ?" The assessee is being taxed in the status of a non-resident. It is not in dispute that the assessee would be liable to tax in respect of the profits and gains arising out of these transactions only if it is established that the said profits are received or are deemed to be received in the taxable territories or if the profits and gains accrue or arise or deem to accrue or arise to the assessee in the taxable territories during the said assessment years. It is an admitted position that the profits have not been received and the question to be considered is whether the profits arising out of these transactions either in whole or in part accrued or arose to the assessee within the taxable territories. The answer to this question in its turn would depend on the question as to whether the said sales have taken place within the taxable territories. In other words, whether the sa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... parties, then the rules do not come into play. It would be recalled that the Tribunal has held that the rule enacted in section 20 of the Act governs the case. The arguments advanced by counsel for the parties centre round the provisions of this section. It would therefore be convenient to read that section before we proceed to deal with the respective arguments. Section 20 is as follows : " 20. Where there is an unconditional contract for the sale of specific goods in a deliverable state, the property in the goods passes to the buyer when the contract is made, and it is immaterial whether the time of payment of the price or the time of delivery of the goods, or both, is postponed." It would be noticed that to attract the provisions of section 20, the following two conditions must be fulfilled : (1) the contract of sale must be for specific goods in a deliverable state, and (2) the contract must be an unconditional one. Unless these two conditions are fulfilled, the section is not attracted. If these two conditions are fulfilled, then the question that arises next is whether there is anything either in the terms of the contract or in the conduct of the parties or in the circums .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... old by the Bombay firm to the Aden parties and the Aden parties had to take delivery of those goods. The endorsement to be made on the bills of lading and the other documents was only for purposes of enabling the purchasers to obtain delivery from the shippers. The endorsement had no concern and had nothing to do with the goods or for giving finishing touches to the goods for the purpose of delivering them to the buyer. In our opinion, therefore, the first condition, namely, that the contract was in respect of specific goods in a deliverable state has been fulfilled. The second question that arises is whether the contract was unconditional. It is the argument of Mr. Mehta that the contract was a conditional one and the condition was the assessee making an endorsement on the documents in Aden. The contract made by the Bombay firm in Bombay thus was not an unconditional one. It therefore had not the effect of passing the property in the goods to the Aden party in Bombay. Mr. Joshi, on the other hand, contends that having regard to the nature of the transaction, the contract was an unconditional one. In our opinion, the contention raised on behalf of the revenue is well-founded. The .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... , and it is therefore necessary to obtain his endorsement to enable the purchasers to obtain delivery of goods from the shippers. The statement of the case also shows that it was only for that purpose that the documents were submitted to the assessee and not for the purpose of completing the transaction of sale. The statement of the case says that the purchasers sent the documents to the assessee at Aden for endorsement of the particulars of his import licence and also for orders to the effect that the goods be delivered to them. In our opinion, therefore, the conditions mentioned in section 20 are fulfilled. The presumption that could therefore arise is that the property in the goods passed to the Aden buyers in Bombay at the time the contract was made, unless of course a different intention of the parties appears either from their conduct or from the circumstances of the case. Now, as regards transactions falling under category 4, the only thing that had remained to be done was obtaining the endorsement on the documents. The documents had already been transferred by the Bombay firm to the representatives of the Aden parties. The documents which were transferred included also doc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 24-25 of the report I and they are : "A cargo at sea while in the hands of the carrier is necessarily incapable of physical delivery. During this period of transit and voyage, the bill of lading by the law merchant is universally recognised as its symbol, and the endorsement and delivery of the bill of lading operates as a symbolical delivery of cargo. Property in the goods passes by such endorsement and delivery of the bill of lading, whenever it is the intention of the parties that the property should pass just as under similar circumstances the property would pass by an actual delivery of the goods." So far as India is concerned, " documents of title " have been defined by sub-section (4) of section 2 of the Act and it provides : " Document of title in goods includes a bill of lading ... and any other document used in the ordinary course of business as proof of possession or control of the goods or authorising or purporting to authorise either by endorsement or by delivery the possessor of the document to transfer or receive the goods thereby represented." It would be clear that in India the bill of lading in the commercial world is used in the ordinary course of business a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on that they have treated both the transactions on the same footing. We find it difficult in the circumstances of the case to so treat the transactions, for reasons which we have already given. In the circumstances, in our opinion, the presumption falling under section 20 would not arise so far as transactions falling under category 3 are concerned. Mr. Joshi contended that practically the major part of the transaction of sale to the Aden buyer had taken place in Bombay. Delivery of the document at Aden was also in the circumstances a mere formality and that would constitute a very insignificant part. We should, therefore, restore the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner in respect of transactions falling under category 3 and hold that 90 per cent. of the profits arising out of those transactions arose in India and 10 per cent. arose in Aden. Mr. Mehta, on the other hand, contends that we should uphold that only 50 per cent. of the profits on these transactions arose in India and 50 per cent. arose in Aden. In our opinion, we would not be justified in entering into the consideration of the question as to what portion of the profits is attributable to the activities in the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates