GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
What's New Case Laws Highlights Articles News Forum Short Notes Statutory TMI SMS More ...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2017 (2) TMI 340 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

2017 (2) TMI 340 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT - [2017] 391 ITR 370 - Allowance of deduction the expenses - business of the Assessee Company was not set up - distinction between setting up of business and commencement of business - Held that:- Tribunal on examination of facts found that the business of the respondent assessee has been set up in the subject assessment year and consequently, the business loss arising on account of expenditure as claimed by the respondent assessee was allowable. Thus whe .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Act, 1961 (the Act) challenges the order dated 19th August, 2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). The impugned order is in respect of Assessment Year 200708. 2. This appeal urges the following question of law for our consideration :- (A) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was correct in allowing as a deduction the expenses claimed by the assessee in its Profit and Loss Account for the year ended 31st March, 2007 without apprecia .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d by the respondent - assessee on the ground that business has not been set up during the year under consideration and no evidence in regard to the same was produced. So far as miscellaneous income of ₹ 24,720/- is concerned, the Assessing Officer brought it to tax as income from other sources. 4. Being aggrieved the respondent - assessee carried matter in Appeal. By the order dated 13th December, 2011 the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) [CIT (A)] upheld the order of Assessing Officer .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ndent filed further appeal to the Tribunal. The Tribunal by the impugned order recorded the fact that the expenses of ₹ 1.17 crores was disallowed as business has not been set up in the year under consideration by the lower authorities. The impugned order also makes reference to the fact that the company was incorporated in the year 2006 and the Assistant Registrar of Companies has issued a certificate that the company had commenced business with effect from 1st October, 2006. Further the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

to the business of asset management. Further, the impugned order relied upon a decision of the Coordinate bench of the Tribunal is case of HSBC Securities India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. decided in ITA No.3181/M/1999 decided on 28th November, 2001 wherein it was held that the business would be held to be set up as and when assessee had taken business premises and has taken steps to recruit employees and has incurred expenses for promoting its business activity In fact the impugned order also records th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

categorised as income from other sources, by the Assessing Officer for subsequent assessment year 2009-10 and accepted by the assessee. 6. The grievance of the revenue before us is only with regard to the impugned order allowing the expenditure of ₹ 1.17 crores as business loss. This conclusion of the Tribunal is premised on the fact that the business has been set up during the year under consideration. It is submitted by the Revenue that no evidence was produced by the assessee to show th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ent of business had come up for consideration before this Court in Western India Vegetable Products Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax 1954 Vol. 26 ITR Page 151. This Court had held that business is said to have been set up when it is established and ready to be commence. However, there may be an interval between a business which is set up and a business which is commenced. However, all expenses incurred during the interregnum between setting up of business and commencement of business would be .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Advanced Search


Latest Notifications:

    Dated      Category

20-7-2017 Cus (NT)

20-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

19-7-2017 IT

19-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 IT

18-7-2017 CE (NT)

18-7-2017 CE

18-7-2017 GST CESS Rate

15-7-2017 Kerala SGST

14-7-2017 Andhra Pradesh SGST

14-7-2017 Cus (NT)

14-7-2017 Cus

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 Co. Law

13-7-2017 ADD

13-7-2017 ADD

12-7-2017 Jammu & Kashmir SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 Gujarat SGST

12-7-2017 CGST Rate

More Notifications


Latest Circulars:

21-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

20-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Goods and Services Tax

19-7-2017 Income Tax

18-7-2017 Customs

17-7-2017 Customs

14-7-2017 Income Tax

13-7-2017 Central Excise

13-7-2017 Customs

More Circulars



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version