TMI Blog2013 (1) TMI 906X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... en proposed for our consideration. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was correct in confirming the order of CIT(A) allowing the assessee's claim of exemption u/s 54F of the Act even though the Juhu Bungalow which the Assessee had purchased as co-owner had been demolished much before completing 3 years of purchase and no new bungalow was constructe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of its purchase, the same would amount to transfer and would be hit by Section 54F(3) of the Act. Consequently, in the previous year relevant to the assessment year under consideration the capital gain tax would be payable on the amounts not charged due to the benefit availed of Section 54F of the Act as held by the assessing officer in his order dated 30.10.2009. 4 The Commissioner of Income ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... does not include an extinguishment of right on account of destruction. It has to be an extinguishment of right on account of transfer. Thus, a destruction of assets when not on account of any transfer would not be hit by Section 54F (3) of the Act. 5 Counsel for the revenue seeks to distinguish the decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Vania Silk Mills P. Ltd. (Supra) that the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
