TMI Blog2017 (3) TMI 71X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he tax demand has already been deposited, the petitioner should get a hearing in other words, a look-in with regard to the applications filed before the Tribunal, concerning the restoration of the appeals, which were dismissed by the Tribunal - stay of recovery granted - appeal allowed - decided in favor of petitioner. - W.P. No. 2404 of 2017 and W.M.P.Nos.2385 and 2386 of 2017 - - - Dated:- 1-2- ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d 26-10-2012, preferred appeals with the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ('the Tribunal' in short). These appeals were numbered as ST/40400/2013-DB and ST/40401/2013-DB. 3.2 The petitioner had filed applications for condonation of delay and for stay in the aforementioned appeals, preferred before the Tribunal. 3.3 By an order dated 18-04-2013, the Tribunal not only ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 58 to 60 of the typed set of documents. The petitioner claims that as against the total demand of ₹ 27,01,636/-(Rupees Twenty Seven lakhs One thousand Six hundred thirty six only) which includes service tax, interest and penalty, she has deposited with the Revenue a sum of ₹ 18,62,390/-(Rupees Eighteen lakhs Sixty Two thousand three hundred ninety only). In effect the stand of the peti ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 8. Accordingly, the Tribunal is requested to consider and dispose of the applications for restoration as, expeditiously, as possible. However, pending disposal of the applications for restoration, the operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed. It would be open to the Tribunal, if it comes to the conclusion that the appeal ought to be restored, to continue the stay qua the impugned order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
