2017 (3) TMI 1188

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ustice Anant S. Dave ) 1. Both these writ petitions filed under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India are against order dated 30.6.2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, Ahmedabad in O.A. Nos.461 and 498 of 2016. 2. The petitioners are aggrieved by following directions of the Tribunal: "10. We direct that the respondents may urgently give due considerat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n vs. Union of India against which Civil Appeal No.8883 of 2011 preferred by Union of India is pending. Therefore, such directions ought not to have issued and further on merit also the case of the respondents deserve no further consideration. 4. As against above, Mr.Nikhil Kariel, learned advocate for the caveator would contend that even the Central Administrative Tribunal has also taken care of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s and circumstances and submissions made by Mr.Nikhil Kariel, learned advocate for the caveator in both these writ petitions, we find that the directions given by the Central Administrative Tribunal in the impugned order of considering the representation stand complied with and now grievances, if any, against such decision, for which, respondents if deemed proper can raise before appropriate forum .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X