2014 (11) TMI 1116

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... PER: R.K. Singh The appellants have filed the stay application along with appeal against Order-in-Original No. 31/2012/ST/JPR-II-Commr dated 14.09.2012 in terms of which a service tax demand of Rs. 1,21,36,522/- for the period April 2006 to March 2011 was confirmed along with interest and penalties under Sections 77, 76 and 78 of the Finance Act 1994. 2. The adjudicating authority held that th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... no reply. Thus the contention that order has been passed in violation of the principles natural justice is totally untenable. The adjudicating authority has clearly brought out as to how the appellants indulged in wilfull misstatement/suppression of facts. While for a certain period they did not include certain charges in the assessable value, for certain period they did not deposit any service t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X