9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (7) TMI 194X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dvocate for the appellant Shri D Nagvenkar, Additional Commissioner (AR) for the respondent ORDER Per: C J Mathew The original authority, Commissioner (TAR), Mumbai vide order no. 07-09/ST/SB/2012-13 dated the 23rd August 2012, having decided on three notices, the appellant, M/s State Trading Corporation of India Ltd has filed three appeals thereof which we dispose of by this common order. The ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s Pranab Agro for import of RBD palmolein, M/s Dinadayal Commodities Pvt Ltd for import of silver and M/s Mehek were among those taken up for scrutiny. 4. It is contended on behalf of the appellant that the goods are sold on 'high sea' and hence constitute a sale that precludes recouse to tax under Finance Act, 1994 on such transaction. Learned Authorised Representative contends that the terms of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r contention of Learned Authorised Representative that the service charges on canalising that were held to be non-includable in the assessable value by the Tribunal in Gupta Chemicals Ltd v. Commissioner of Customs, Jaipur [2002 (148) ELT 535 (Tri-Del)] counters the claim of the appellant that the activity is exclusively taxable as a transaction in goods. 5. It appears from the investigations tha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hority for initiating recovery proceedings. In the light of the elaborate discussions in the impugned order and the detailed examination of the various agreements, we are unable to concur with the appellant that the various submissions made by them had not been considered by the adjudicating authority. 7. We find that the grounds of appeal are devoid of any cogent submissions to controvert the fi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
