9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (7) TMI 588X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Respondents : Mr.Rajasekaran, CGSC (R1) Mr.V.Venkatesan, CGSC (R2) ORDER Heard Mr.N.Kannan, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Rajasekaran, learned Central Government Standing Counsel for R1 and Mr.V.Venkatesan, learned Central Government Standing Counsel for R2. 2.1 The petitioner is a Company, engaged in the manufacture of automobile goods, which are exported using machinery imported unde ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s to the 3rd respondent Bank, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3. At the time when the writ petition was entertained, an order of status-quo was granted on 26.06.2008, which is in force till date. 4. The consistent case of the petitioner is that they have completed the export obligation by exporting the products through third party exporters, whose names or details have been furnishe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... xport obligation. If the scheme provides for the importer to export the goods through third party exporters, then, the competent authority under the Scheme is entitled to examine the correctness of the stand taken by the exporter. In the instant case, the department would admit that the petitioner had produced copies of the shipping bills, but the department is insisting upon the originals, which ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rd parties, then the proper officer of the Joint Directorate General of Foreign Trade, shall examine the genuineness of those exports and pass a speaking order, on merits and in accordance with law. 8. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the bank guarantee furnished by the petitioner had expired and not being renewed and an order of status-quo was granted in the writ pe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
