2017 (8) TMI 163

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nil Gangur a/w Mr. Sham Walve for the respondent ORDER P. C.   1. The present appellant had filed an appeal before the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), before the order in original is passed. The appeal was filed along with the application for condonation of delay and the application for waiver of pre-deposit of the amount. 2. The CESTAT found the reasons given f .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the appeal does arise in the present matter. 4. The learned Counsel for the respondent submits that the Tribunal had granted sufficient time to the appellant to deposit the amount. The appellant failed to deposit the amount. No illegality has been committed by the Tribunal while passing the impugned order. The order in original is also not challenged in the present appeal. 5. It appears that the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... a reasonable time. 7. Considering the bona fides shown by the appellant, we are inclined to exercise discretion in favour of the appellant. 8. In the light of the above, we pass the following order : ORDER (a) The appellant shall deposit the amount as directed by the CESTAT under order dated 21.11.2014 within a period of six weeks from today. (b) On the deposit of the amount as directed abov .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X