2017 (10) TMI 555

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nt : Mr. Himanshu Khemka, Advocate Present for the Respondent: Ms. Neha Garg, D.R. ORDER Per: S.K. Mohanty This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 25.09.2012 passed by the Commissioner Appeals, Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax, Indore. In this case, service tax demand was confirmed against the appellant on the ground that during the period from May 2005 to July 2008, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... judged demand. 3. On the other hand, the ld. DR appearing for the respondent reiterated the findings recorded in the impugned order. 4. Heard both sides and perused the case records. 5. During the course of hearing, the ld. Advocate has submitted the statement, showing reconciliation of service tax paid as per the ST-3 returns. However, on perusal of the case records, we find that the said figu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X