2017 (12) TMI 823

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of Mistake application filed by Microtol Sterilisation Services Pvt. Ltd. 2. Ld. Counsel for the applicant pointed out that the Rule 6(6)(a) was given retrospective effect from 10.02.2006 and not 10.02.2008 as has been mentioned in para 6 and 7 of the Tribunal's order dated 17.08.2017. He further pointed out that the decision in the Sujana Metal Products has not been correctly appreciated in the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... have been amended retrospectively, in the manner specified in column (2) of the Eighth Schedule, on and from the date specified in column (3) of that Schedule, against the rule specified in column (1) of that Schedule. (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in any judgment, decree or order of any court, Tribunal or other authority, any action taken or anything done or purported to have been take .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to the claim of the appellants that the decision in the case of Sujana Metal Products has not been considered in proper perspective. It is seen that the said decision has been examined in para 5 of the impugned order. In Rectification of Mistake jurisdiction the said matter cannot be considered by the Tribunal. The said claim is dismissed. 6. The Rectification of Mistake application is partly al .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X