TMI Blog2009 (11) TMI 986X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... .R.BRAHMBHATT For the Appellant: MR ND SONGARA For the Respondent: MS SEJAL K MANDAVIA COMMON ORAL ORDER Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BHAGWATI PRASAD) Heard learned advocates for the parties. The present respondent- original petitioner in Special Civil Application No. 27730 of 2007 has approached this Court for setting aside the order dated 13th August, 2006 passed by the Commissioner of disa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng the evidence on record, vide order dated 13.8.2007 held that the appellant is having mental disability 40-70% and therefore, she is entitled the protection of Section 47 of the Act and ordered the respondent to reinstate the appellant and give the suitable work. The respondent challenged the said order by preferring Special Civil Application No. 27730 of 2007 and the learned Single Judge by ord ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... advocate for the appellant candidly admits before the Court that there is lapses on the part of the appellant in conducting the case and certain documents, which were necessary, were not produced. Even those documents, worth the same, were not shown to us. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the matter, no interference is required in the matter. Therefore, appeal is rejected. ORD ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|