9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (1) TMI 759X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Officer-cum- Designated Officer, Jalandhar-I for the lapses committed by him intentionally which is duly proved from the material brought on record. Further prayer has been made for a direction to respondent Nos. 4 and 5 to initiate criminal action against respondent No.6 as he failed to discharge the duties of a public servant, acting with criminal intent to cause loss to the petitioner and for demanding illegal gratification from him. 2. A few facts relevant for the decision of the controversy involved as narrated in the petition may be noticed. The petitioner is involved in the business of sale of automobile glasses and silicon. In the business, he used to import/purchase silicon material from the manufacturer situated out of the State ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dhar Division, Jalandhar by furnishing an affidavit dated 3.9.2015 giving all the details. Respondent No.6 also threatened the petitioner that in case the demand was not met, his TIN number would be blocked and the assessment cases would be decided against him and huge tax liability alongwith penalty would be raised against him. On 2.9.2015, respondent No.6 in a single day finalized the assessment proceedings for the years 2010- 11 and 2011-12 and issued four notices under Section 29 and 30 of the Act. In the month of September 2015, respondent No.6 blocked the TIN number of the petitioner for three months. The petitioner requested respondent No.6 several times to unlock the TIN number but in vain. According to the petitioner, the illegal a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r recorded that whether the said amount was to be treated as costs, the same shall be subject to final outcome of the writ petition. On 14.12.2017, learned counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that as per the information received by him under the RTI Act, inquiry against respondent No.6 had been concluded. Accordingly, learned State Counsel was directed to produce the inquiry report as well as other relevant record for perusal of the court. In compliance thereto, enquiry report dated 13.8.2017 and other relevant record was produced. A perusal of the said report shows that all the charges have been proved against respondent No.6. Further, a copy of the memo dated 22.9.2017 issued to respondent No.6 has also been produced wherein res ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
