2018 (2) TMI 395

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nt Through Mr. R. Santhanam & Mr. A.P. Sinha, Advocates.   O R D E R Having heard counsel for the parties, we are inclined to frame the following substantial question of law:- (i) Whether the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in allowing the appeal preferred by the assessee holding that the Revenue could not have applied the extended period of limitation? Counse .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... case, he has no objection if the impugned order is set aside with an order of reward. He states that the Tribunal has not decided the question whether the respondent assessee was entitled to CENVAT credit of additional customs duty paid through DEPB receipts. In view of the statement made by Mr. R. Santhanam, Advocate, we are setting aside the impugned order with a direction for remand, without .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X