9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (2) TMI 558X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ce (Dr.) Satish Chandra: The present appeal is filed against order-in-original No. 279-280/35-36/V/2006/Commr/RH dated 07.04.2006. 2. Brief facts of the case are that on 24.04.2002 a search was conducted at the premises of the assessee who was engaged in manufacturing of printing machines. At the time of search, it was recorded in the panchanama that small lathe machine which was found in the fa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ade the duty. Learned A.R submits that the Proprietors though different are controlled by Shri Arun D. Palsamkar who is the Proprietor of Speedo-O-graph. He also drew our attention to the statement of Shri J. Shantaram Patil, Proprietor of M/s. Trimurthy Enterprises dated 09.08.2004 admitting that when the turn-over of Speed-O-Graph has increased, Ganesh Enginee ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ses are different and assessments are also different. She also submits that the assessee-respondent has not filed Cross Objection or Cross appeal against the impugned order. 6. We have heard both the parties at length and have gone through the record. It appears that by impugned order the adjudicating authority has levied duty demand (of Rs. 50 lakhs along with interest) o ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
