TMI Blog2018 (2) TMI 705X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ice Dr. Satish Chandra In the revised list, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 2. Heard learned Authorised Representative of the department and perused the record. 3. Earlier, the Tribunal vide its final order No. A/1033 to 1040/2005 dated 11/10/2005 has remanded the matter to the original authority for the limited purpose of re-quantification. The Tribunal direc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ification of duty is not possible at this stage as ordered by Honble CESTAT...." 5. From the above, it is crystal clear that the appellant was not having any material to support its submissions in the light of the Tribunal's decision. 6. Even today, in the revised list, none is present for the appellant nor any adjournment application is available on record. It shows that the appellant ha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|