Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1941 (4) TMI 17

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... iable instruments. The facts show that some time in May 1989 the plaintiff was the consignee of certain coils of galvanized wire which he bad obtained from a firm named Toho of Osaka and the consignors sent to the bank in Osaka, who forwarded them to the branch of the Yokohama Specie Bank in Rangoon, a bill of lading which was a document of title to the goods and a bill of exchange. On the discounting of the latter the bill of lading would pass title in the goods to the payer. When the bill of exchange arrived at the bank it was seen that there was, in addition to the name of Bholat upon it, the name of the Central Commercial Corporation as drawee in case of need, and that of course means that if the bank for any reason were unable to obt .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... not do otherwise, -- the property in the galvanized wire coils never passed to him and the contract which he had originally entered into by reason of his accepting the draft came to an end when the draft was dishonoured on 20th July 1939. 2. In those circumstances the bank had recourse to the drawee in case of need, and they first of all met with some hesitation, but it is quite wrong to say that the bill was ever dishonoured by the drawee in case of need. It was accepted finally by the Corporation on 11th September. At that stage the position, of course, was that when the bill was met on presentation the documents of title to the goods would pass to the drawee in case of need. There is no kind of ground for the suggestion that th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eason of the fact that they had accepted the bill drawn on them in case of need, another contract had been ever made with Mr. Bholat, he might no doubt sue the bank on that contract. 4. He has here contended up to a certain point that he was entitled at all time to the goods by reason of the fact, as he says, that there was an understanding between him and the Yokohama Specie Bank at Rangoon that there would be a settlement after instructions were received from Osaka. Learned counsel has been unable to show on his behalf when a firm contract was entered into but he has tried to rely upon the visit of the plaintiff to the bank on 22nd September and upon some subsequent correspondence in which no reference is made to a firm contract having .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... willing that Mr. Bholat should receive these consignments and was saying so to Mr. Bholat; he was using his endeavours on Mr. Bholat's behalf and at the same time asking if he wanted goods of some other description. It is quite plain that Mr. Toho was doing his best to do further business with the plaintiff and was saying that, so far as he was concerned, he was quite ready to accept payment from the plaintiff. But the true owners of the goods, the bank, had already made a contract with another person; that contract was due to Mr. Bholat's default. Therefore, in my opinion, there can be no doubt that the learned Judge was right in the view which be took, that Bholat was blowing hot and cold, had made default in his first contract, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ngoon branch of the respondent bank and the appellant, and for this purpose be relies on a letter of 22nd September which he sent to the bank. To this letter no reply was given. The letter stated that the appellant was at that stage prepared to pay the amount due on the bill of exchange and all charges provided he could get delivery of the goods. Of course, that was a mere offer which had to be accepted and for its acceptance the appellant relies on oral evidence, regarding an alleged oral acceptance by Mr. Paul. But, unfortunately for the appellant, apart from any question as to what Mr. Paul did say to the appellant, the appellant has omitted to prove that Mr. Paul had any authority from the bank to enter into a contract on the bank's .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates