TMI Blog2018 (3) TMI 98X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... A/50246/2018-EX[DB] - Dated:- 17-1-2018 - Dr. Satish Chandra, (President) And V. Padmanabhan (Technical Member) Present Mr Jitin Singhal, Advocate - for the Appellant Present Mr H. Saini, DR - for the Respondent ORDER Per: Dr. Satish Chandra 1. The present appeal is against Order-in-Original 37/2007 dated 12/08/2017. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the appe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 3. In compliance to the directions, the Original Authority has passed the impugned order where the earlier order was repeated pertaining to the demand and penalty as well as redemption fine. Still not being satisfied, the appellant has filed the present appeal. 4. With this background we heard Shri Jitin Singhal, Ld. Advocate for the appellant and Shri H.C. Saini, Ld. DR for the Revenue. It ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... awn in FIL s Godown No.1, 16968 Kgs are claimed to be belonging to WIL and similarly, at Sl. No. 7 with reference to final Panchnama dtd. 01.05.96 drawn in FIL s Godown No.2, 50464 Kgs are claimed to be belonging to WIL but no document to this effect is produced at the time of re-adjudication. Thus, the total quantity of yarn mentioned as 7,16,817 kgs in the Annexure-W is not acceptable. 5. D ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ts and decide the issue de novo but by providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the appellant. Additional evidence, if need be, may be admitted as per law. It may mention that the matter is too old and we are remanding the matter with a heavy heart, so it is expected that Adjudicating Authority will decide the matter within a period of three months. If assessee will not cooperate then law wi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
