9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (3) TMI 129X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ion seeks to challenge the order dated 14.09.2016 passed by the Deputy Director General of Foreign Trade and the decision dated 31.5.2016 rendered by the Policy Relaxation Committee (hereafter referred to as 'PRC'). 2. Perusal of the order dated 14.9.2016 would show that it was based on an application dated 18.7.2016 addressed to the Chairperson of the Appellate Committee, Government of India, Mi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 4.1 Counsel for the petitioner says that he will prefer an appeal under Section 15 of the 1992 Act to the Appellate Authority qua the decision dated 11.2.2016 rendered by the Assistant Development Commissioner. 5. The decision, rendered by the Assistant Development Commissioner, in sum, denies the drawback claimed by the petitioner for the period from April - June 2011 to October - December 2012 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... encing from April 2011. 8. Given these circumstances, counsel for the petitioner says he would like to withdraw this writ petition and take his chance with the Appellate Authority constituted under Section 15 of the 1992 Act. 9. Since, the appeal which the petitioner intends to file is beyond the period of 45 days prescribed under Section 15 of the 1992 Act, the Appellate Authority will condone ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
