2018 (3) TMI 695

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he petitioner. Ms. S.V. Bharucha for respondent no. 1. Mr. P.S. Jetly for respondent no. 2. P.C. :- 1. We have heard both sides on this civil application. There is no affidavit in reply. Each of the factual statements made in this application are, therefore, deemed to have been admitted. The petitioner is the beneficiary of an order passed against the respondent Revenue on 29th August, 2007 by .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . 4. This writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to give effect to the order of the CESTAT as expeditiously as possible and in any event within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Once no contentions contrary to the Hon'ble Supreme Court order can be advanced by the Revenue, then, the respondents are bound and liable to implement the ord .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X