Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2018 (3) TMI 1033

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... a loss of Rs. 25,93,498/-. In the said return, deduction of Rs. 53,46,249/- was claimed by the assessee on account of interest paid on borrowed funds. During the course of assessment proceedings, the assessee was called upon by the A.O. to establish the nexus between the interest bearing borrowed funds and her business activities. In reply, the following submissions were made by the assessee before the A.O.: "In response thereto assessee furnished a written submission stating inter alia: 'That the Dalmias namely your assessee Smt. Shyama Devi Dalmia and her husband Shri Kailash Pati Dalmia were having following individuals and companies under their control: 1. Smt. Shyama Devi Dalmia 2. Sri Kailash Pati Dalmia 3. Star Iron Wor .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... before the Ld. CIT(A) and the following submissions were made on behalf of the assessee in support of her case on the issue before the Ld. CIT(A): "3.1 That the assessee Mrs Shyama Devi Dalmia being an individual e-filed her Return of Income showing Net Loss of Rs. 25,93,498. The case was selected for scrutiny through CASS and Assessment Order was passed by the Income Tax Officer 31(4) vide order dated 2010212075. The Ld. Assessing Officer while passing the Assessment Order u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 added following amount in the income of the Assessee: (a) Interest Paid Rs. 53,46,249/- (b) Cash Receipts Rs. 35,50,000/- 3.2 That being aggrieved with the addition for interest paid of Rs. 53,46,249 by the Appellant A .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... loan taken on fixed deposits is erroneous. The Ld. A.O. stated in his order 'From the explanation as above, it is evident that the interest claimed to have been paid by the assessee has no nexus with the present activities of the assessee who has been earning interest income mainly from Bank/Other Deposits' 3.4 That the conclusion of the Ld. A.O. in his Assessment Order regarding claim of assessee for interest paid against loan taken on fixed deposits is erroneous. The Ld. A.O. stated in his order 3.5 That the Ld. A.O. failed to appreciate the entire facts and documents on records submitted during the course of assessment proceeding. The Ld. A.O. failed to note that the capital of the Appellant Assessee at the beginning of the Fin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ef to the Appellant Assessee accordingly." 5. The Ld. CIT(A) found merit in the submissions made on behalf of the assessee and deleted the disallowance made by the A.O. on account of interest by following the order of the Tribunal in assessee's own case dated April 24, 2014 in ITA No. 1588/Kol/2010 for A.Y. 2006-07on the similar issue. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. CIT(A), revenue has preferred this appeal before the Tribunal. 6. We have heard the arguments of both the sides and also perused the relevant material available on record. As agreed by the learned representatives of both the sides, the solitary issue involved in this appeal of the revenue in relation to the deletion by the Ld. CIT(A) of the disallowance made by the A.O. on .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nterest-free funds available. In our opinion, the Supreme Court in East India Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. (supra) had the occasion to consider the decision of the Calcutta High Court in Woolcombers of India Ltd, (supra) where a similar issue had arisen. Before the Supreme Court it was argued that it should have been presumed that in essence and true character the taxes were paid out of the profits of the relevant year and not out of the overdraft account for the running of the business and in these circumstances the appellant was entitled to claim the deductions, The Supreme Court noted that the argument had considerable force, but considering the fact that the contention had not been advanced earlier it did not require to be answered. It the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates