9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (3) TMI 1187X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Appellants Shri S K Bansal, AR for the Respondent Per: Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra: The present appeal is filed against the order in Original No. UDZ-EXCUS-000-COM-0016-16-17 dated 13.5.2017. The period of dispute is from April, 2014 to September, 2014. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Zinc & lead concentrate lia ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... kground, we have heard Shri Hemant Bajaj and Shri S K Bansal, learned Counsels for the parties. 4. After hearing both the sides and on perusal of record, it appears that in the assessee's own case for the earlier period, the issue has came up before the Tribunal as M/s. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. vs. CCE, Udaipur [Final Order No. 56669/2017 dated 01.09.2017] wherein it was observed as under: &nbs ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ion:- 1. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. vs. CCE, Jaipur-II, Final Order No.A/53738/2016-EX[DB]. 2. CCE, Jaipur-II vs. Hindustan Zinc Ltd.- 2014 (34) STR 440 (Tri.:-Del.) 3. CCE & ST, Udaipur vs. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. Final Order No. 55702-55703/2016 dated 24.11.2016. 4. Hindustan Zinc Ltd. vs. CCE, Jaipur, Final Order No. A/58300/2013 dated 07.11.2013. 5. Hindustan ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
