9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (9) TMI 1640X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ent: N.L. Agarwal with Mr. S. L. Poddar Judgment 1. In all these appeals since identical questions of law and facts are involved, they are decided by this common judgment. 2. By way of these appeals, the appellant has challenged the judgment and order of the Tribunal whereby the Tribunal has allowed the appeal of the assessee. 3. This court while admitting the appeals framed the follow ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng addition of Rs. 5,12,77,217/ignoring admitted facts in the statement of Shri Khushi Kumar Ameriya (Director) u/s 132(4) of the IT Act as well as the evidences gathered during search confirming bogus purchase bills obtained?" 4. D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 128/2014 "Whether the ITAT order is perverse in deleting the entire trading addition of Rs. 4,21,16,555/ignoring admitted facts in the stat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he case of the assesssee was centralized with ACIT, Central Circle-1, Jaipur, who issued notice under Section-153A to the assessee company on 23.09.2009. In response the return was filed on 28.04.2011, declaring income of Rs. 17,86,470. Assessment was completed at Rs. 98,87,157 through order dated 23.08.2011 passed under Section-143(3)r.w.s.153A by the ACIT, Central Circle-1, Jaipur. 5. We have h ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
