Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2018 (5) TMI 744

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ting the total income at Rs. 65,13,730/-, against the total income of Rs. 1,100/- declared by the assessee in his return was partly reversed. 2. The brief fact of the case is that the assessee purchased agricultural land in different sizes from different parties totalling measuring 329 .00 decimal on various dates in the year 2006, the details whereof are given in the assessment order. The consideration amount for such purchase was Rs. 13,87,365/- for the financial year 2006-07. On 25.06.2009 the said land was sold to one Utkarsh Metal Industries Pvt. Ltd for a consideration of Rs. 74,00,000/- relating to A.Y.2010-11. This resulted in a gain of Rs. 60,12,635/-. 3. According to the AO no agricultural activity was ever conducted by the asse .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ade by the AO in his order dated 30.03.2013. According to him there was no agricultural activity during 2006 to 2009 on that particular land. He further pointed out that the assessee failed to produce supporting evidence to prove the land to be a agricultural land before the AO and that no documents were submitted, which will prove that agricultural operation are made on the particular land. He further contended that this is an area with industrial growth for the last couple of years and that the assessee purchased the land for industrial use. He sought to substantiate his argument with the fact of change of price, where the value of land rose to Rs. 74,00,000/- from Rs. 13,87,365/- within a period of less than three years. The ld. DR has a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... onment board and which has a population of not less than ten thousand or (b) In any area within the distance, measured aerially - I) not being more than two kilometres, from the local limits of any municipality or cantonment board referred to in item (a) and which has a population of more than ten thousand but not exceeding one lakh; or II) not being more than six kilometres, from the local limits of any municipality or cantonment board referred to item (a) and which has a population of more than one lakh but not exceeding ten lakh; or III) not being more than eight kilometres, from the local limits of any municipality or cantonment board referred to in item (a) and which has a population of more than ten lakh." 9. In the inst .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ticular land is agricultural land or not depends upon so many factors. Any agricultural income derived from agricultural operations will qualify for agricultural income. So far as capital gains on the sale of such land is concerned, it also depends upon factors like location of the land, use of the land, distance from municipal limit, whether land use was changed, etc. If all these factors are cumulatively kept in mind, one fact emerges that the impugned land is situated beyond the prescribed limit from the municipality, recorded as agricultural land in the revenue record, agricultural operation was done by one caretaker, hence there is no question of capital gains tax on sale of such land. The correct test that has to be applied is whether .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... embracing connotation and includes every kind of property as generally understood except those are expressly excluded from the definition. It is exactly the case here because section 2(l4)(iii) expressly defines agricultural land with regard to its location and distance from the municipal limit. It seems that the learned Assessing Officer has not examined the documents produced by the assessee establishing the distance of land beyond prescribed municipal limit and more specifically when Khasra number, etc. has been duly mentioned in the report of Tehsildar. So far as the argument of the AO that the land was sold at a substantial amount is not the relevant factor to prove that it was non-agricultural land because it depends upon so many fact .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates