2018 (7) TMI 676

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . ORDER Per Bench Brief facts are that the respondent is engaged in the manufacture of Paper Board and Paper Cones. They were availing concession of duty upto 3500 MTs as per the Notification No. 4/2006-CE dated 01.03.2006. The department was of the view that since the respondents are availing concession of duty, they are not eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 67/1995-CE dated 16.03 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... strued as exemption from whole of excise duty. Thus, the department cannot deny the exemption under Notification No. 67/1995-CE. In the case of Pitamber Coated Paper Ltd. Vs. CCE, Jaipur -2003 (157) ELT 297 (Tri.-Del.), it was held that the benefit of captive consumption exemption under Notification 67/1995-CE cannot be denied when the final products were cleared without payment of duty under Noti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X