TMI Blog2016 (3) TMI 1309X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eginning from the year in respect of which he has exercised such option subject to the fulfillment of conditions prescribed in the section. Hence, the term ‘initial assessment year’ would mean the first year opted for by the assessee for claiming deduction u/s 80IA. However, the total number of years for claiming deduction should not transgress the prescribed slab of fifteen or twenty years, as the case may be and the period of claim should be availed in continuity. The Assessing Officers are, therefore, directed to allow deduction u/s 80IA in accordance with this clarification and after being satisfied that all the prescribed conditions applicable in a particular case are duly satisfied. Pending litigation on allowability of deduction u ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or the Department. Mr.R.Sivaraman, learned counsel takes notice for the respondents. 3. Even according to the learned Standing Counsel for the Department, this Court has consistently followed the decision in M/s.Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills (340 ITR 477), despite the Honourable Supreme Court ordering notice. 4. Interestingly, on the basis of the decision in Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills, the Central Board of Direct Taxes has issued Circular No.1/ 2016 dated 15.2.2016. It will be useful to extract the circular in entirety, which is as follows : Circular No.1/2016 Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Direct Taxes North Block, New Delhi, the 15th February, 2016 Subject: Clarif ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ation is to be made . In the above Sub-Section, which prescribes the manner of determining the quantum of deduction, a reference has been made to the term initial assessment year . It has been represented that some Assessing Officers are interpreting the term initial assessment year as the year in which the eligible business/manufacturing activity had commenced and are considering such first year of commencement/operation etc. itself as the first year for granting deduction, ignoring the clear mandate provided under Sub-Section (2) which allows a choice to the assessee for deciding the year from which it desires to claim deduction out of the applicable slab of fifteen (or twenty) years. The matter has been examined by the Board. It ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... icers concerned. 5. Therefore, admittedly, the second question of law is covered by the above circular. Hence, the appeals deserve to be dismissed. 6. Accordingly, the above tax case appeals are dismissed. No costs. 7. But, we cannot resist our temptation to record one more fact. If an issue is covered by the judgment of the High Court, it is always open to the Department to take it on appeal to the Supreme Court and get the law settled once and for all. But, once a decision is taken at the level of the Board, we do not know why repeated appeals should be filed, only to meet with the same fate as that of a decision, on which, a circular has been issued. The Department shall take note of this for future guidance. - - TaxTMI ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
