TMI Blog2017 (3) TMI 1691X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... applicant in O.A.No.1410 of 2013 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad. By order dated 16.12.2016, the Tribunal dismissed the said O.A. The prayer of the petitioner before the Tribunal in the said O.A was to set aside the proceedings dated 30.10.2012 of the Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, State of Andhra Pradesh, and to consequently direct the authorities to give ef ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e extent of stating that the authorities could not take the stand that as per G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 22.04.1994, the petitioner had not put in the minimum service of five years as on 25.11.1993 and that his case is to be considered only as per G.O.Ms.No.10 dated 04.02.1991. The Tribunal accordingly directed the authorities to reconsider the entire issue in the light of G.O.Ms.No.10 dated 04.02.1991 a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nted through the Andhra Pradesh Technology Services Limited, the question of defeating the said policy by refusing to regularise the services of the petitioner who claims to be covered thereby by citing State of Karnataka v. Uma Devi 2006 (4) SCC 1 does not arise. That apart, at one stage, the Commercial Tax Authorities would state that the post of Data Entry Operator does not exist in the Depart ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of Andhra Pradesh, and remit the matter to him for consideration of the whole issue afresh in terms of the order passed by the Tribunal in O.A.No.12567 of 2009. Unfortunately, the Tribunal failed to take note of the aforestated aspects while dismissing O.A.No.1410 of 2013. In consequence, the order dated 16.12.2016 passed by the Tribunal in O.A.No.1410 of 2013 is also set aside. The fresh exercise ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|