Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2018 (8) TMI 549

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... kar, forest fee, entry tax etc. for the period March, 2011 to February, 2013 and demand was confirmed (Royalty charge) under the erstwhile Sections 11A and 11A(5) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Although M/s. SECL paid the differential duty but passed on the Cenvat Credit by issuing supplementary invoices. According to the department any supplementary bill showing payment of duty on the abovementioned charges for the invoice during the period March, 2011 to February, 2013 will fall under the exclusion clause of Rule 9(1)(b) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for the purpose of taking Cenvat Credit. 3. The Appellants are engaged in manufacture of Bulk/ Lead/ Zinc Concentrates. They availed and utilized the Cenvat Credit amounting to Rs. 1,02,392 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . Steel Authority of India Ltd. and therefore the denial of Cenvat credit by the department on the ground of fraud, suppression is not tenable. He further submitted that in an identical matter titled as M/s Birla Corporation Ltd. vs. CGST, CC & CE, Jabalpur, this Tribunal vide Final order No. 52486 of 2018 dated 3.7.2018 in Excise Appeal No. 50308/2010 allowed the Cenvat Credit availed by the Appellant therein holding that there cannot be suppression of fact when the issue of liability of payment of Excise duty at the end of the coal companies is pending adjudication before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The relevant extract of the said order of this Tribunal is extracted as under:- "7. Having considered the rival contentions of both the side .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of Rule 9(1)(b) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 which is reproduced as under:- "Rule 9. Documents and accounts.- (1) The CENVAT credit shall be taken by the manufacturer or the provider of output service or input service distributor, as the case may be, on the basis of any of the following documents, namely:- (b) a supplementary invoice, issued by a manufacturer or importer of inputs or capital goods in terms of the provisions of Central Excise Rules, 2002 from his factory or depot or from the premises of the consignment agent of the said manufacturer or importer or from any other premises from where the goods are sold by, or on behalf of, the said manufacturer or importer, in case additional amount of excise duties or additional duty le .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rla Corporation Ltd. vs. CGST, CC & CE, Jabalpur; (ii) Final Order No. 52540-41/2018, dated 18.7.2018 in Appeal No. E/ 50633/2018-SMC, titled as Jaypee Sidhi Cement Plant vs. CGST C.C. & C.E., Jabalpur; and Appeal No. E/51064/2018-SMC titled as Hindustan Zinc Ltd. vs. CE & ST, Udaipur; (iii) Final Order No. 52611/2018, dated 23.7.2018 in Excise Appeal No. E/ 51284/2018-[SM], titled as M/s. Ultratech Cement Ltd. vs. CCE, Raipur; (iv) Final Order No. 52625/2018, dated 23.7.2018 in Excise Appeal No. 51278/2018, titled as M/s. Birla Corporation Ltd. vs. CGST, CC & CE, Udaipur; (v) Final Order No. 52640/2018, dated 23.7.2018 in Excise Appeal No. E/ 50077/2018[SM], titled as Shri Barjrang Power & Ispat Ltd. vs. CCE, Jaipur; (vi) Fi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... at there is no element of fraud and suppression on the part of the appellant. The issue herein is recurring in nature. Accordingly, we allow this appeal and hold that the appellant is entitled to take cenvat credit on the supplementary invoices in question. Thus, the appeal is allowed with consequential relief to the appellant. " 12. Similarly in Final Order No. 52640/2018, dated 23.7.2018 in Excise Appeal No. E/ 50077/ 2018 [SM], titled as Shri Barjrang Power & Ispat Ltd. vs. CCE, Jaipur, this Tribunal while allowing the Appeal filed by the Appellant therein held as under:- "7. No doubt, it is apparent on record that the show cause notice to M/s SECL is prior event than the appellant availing the credit on supplementary invoices issued .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates