TMI Blog2018 (8) TMI 1651X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 7 (12) TMI 289 - DELHI HIGH COURT). It cannot therefore be held that the DoE has not complied with the requirements of the law. Consequently, this Court is not inclined to entertain ‘Prayer A’ made in the present petition. It shall however be open to the Petitioner to urge any other ground concerning the legality of the arrest of the Petitioner's husband arrest before the Roster Bench which will e ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... The first seeks issuance of a writ of habeas corpus by alleging that the Petitioner s husband, Ranjit Malik, was taken away by the officers of the Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) (Respondent No.2) without complying with the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 ( PMLA ). In particular, it is stated that the Petitioner s husband was not informed of the grounds of his arrest as ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2017 in W.P.(Crl.) 2465/2017). Consequently, this question along with certain others was referred to a larger Bench of three judges for consideration. 3. The above decision in Rajbhushan Omprakash Dixit v. Union of India (supra) was challenged by the DoE before the Supreme Court of India which by its order dated 15th March 2018 in Special Leave Petition (Crl) [Diary No.9365] of 2018 transferre ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
