TMI Blog2018 (8) TMI 1659X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ; there is no dispute by the appellant on this aspect. However, the interest liability is disputed. It is seen that the appellant had made detailed submissions and furnished computation before the first appellate authority which had not been taken into account or considered - matter requires reconsideration - appeal allowed by way of remand. - APPEAL NO: E/85443/2017 - A/87078/2018 - Dated:- 1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 12/- towards interest liability. The first appellate authority did not find any reason to interfere with the order of the original authority leading to the present appeal. 3. Learned Counsel for appellant submits that the adjudicating authority had erred in computing the interest of ₹ 4,78,212/- and that they had paid ₹ 1,53,628/- during the course of dispute towards interest. It wa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sputed. It is seen that the appellant had made detailed submissions and furnished computation before the first appellate authority which had not been taken into account or considered. In order to enable this exercise to be carried out, the appeal is allowed by way of remand to the original authority with the direction to confine itself to ascertainment of the amount paid towards interest and conse ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
