9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (9) TMI 582X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sha Banu J. For the Petitioners : Mr. P. Radhakrishnan For the Respondent 1, 2, 3 : Mr. R. Arvindan And Mr. K. Govindarajan COMMON ORDER As the issue involved in all the three Writ Petitions are one and the same, the cases are taken up for disposal by a Common Order. 2. In W.P(MD).No.9717 of 2012, the writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for a Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 14022 of 2011, the writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for a Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the first respondent in C.No.V/ST/15/108/2011 - ST adjn NCS No.25 of 2011 - ST and quash the proceedings dated 18.10.2011 issued therein, besides directing the second and third respondents who are Government of India Enterprise to remit the applicable taxes in respect of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , by order dated 02.09.2010 passed in W.P.Nos.19510 to 19512 of 2010, has held as follows: "2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that subsequent to the issuance of summons, a circular No.123/5/2010 was issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs, dated 24.5.2010 and in view of the issuance of the said Circular, though the same was issued earlier, the petitioners cases are b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... /reply within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the first respondent is directed to consider the objections and proceed with the matter and pass final orders, within a period of eight (8)weeks, from the date of receipt of objections from the petitioners." 8. In the light of the aforesaid judgment of this Court, I am of the view that the case of the petitio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
