TMI Blog2018 (9) TMI 642X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... INEET KOTHARI J. 1. Learned counsel for the appellant- Central Excise Department submits that the Central Board of Indirect - Taxes & Customs (Judicial Cell), Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi vide notification - F No.390/Misc./116/2017.JC dated: 11.07.2018, has issued instructions to all the Principal Chief Commissioners, etc., for withdrawal of the pending appeals in the fie ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Commissioner (AR); Commissioner Directorate of Legal Affairs, CBIC; 4. Subject: Reduction of Government Litigation - Raising of monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department before CESTAT/High Courts and Supreme Court in Legacy Central Excise and Service Tax: regarding. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944 made applicable to Service Tax vid ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s will continue to apply. 3. It may be noted that issued involving substantial questions of law as described in para 1.3 of the Instruction dt. 17.08.2011 from F No.390/Misc/163/2010-JC would be contested irrespective of the prescribed monetary limits. 4. Since withdrawal of Departmental Appeals is a long drawn activity requiring routine and constant monitoring, formats have been introduced in t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ary limit of Rs. 50,00,000/- and that the present case does not fall under the exception category of Notification dated 17.08.2011 referred in paragraph No.4 of the aforesaid Instructions dated 11.7.2018. Therefore, present appeal may permitted to be dismissed as withdrawn/ not pressed.
3. The appeal filed by Revenue are, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed. No costs. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|