2018 (9) TMI 1126

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ri V. Gupta, AR ORDER Per: Mr. Ashok Jindal The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order. 2. The facts of the case are that, the appellant was engaged in the manufacture of Lead Ingots & Lead Oxide. As the appellant was located in the State of Jammu & Kashmir, they were availing benefit of exemption Notification No. 56/2002-CE dated 14.11.2002. The appellant were clearing their good .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... riod April 2007 to January 2010 was dropped. Against the said order, the appellant is in appeal. 3. Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that initially they filed the refund claim and the same was sanctioned to them as outward freight forms a part transaction value and therefore, they have correctly paid the duty and refund claim was rightly sanctioned. In that circumstance, without challenging .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ment orders of refund claims sanctioning thereof, can be challenged by way of issuance of show cause notice under Section 11A of the Act or not. The said issue is exempted by the Hon'ble High Court of Gauhati in the case of Jellalpur Tea Estate (supra), wherein the Hon'ble High Court observed as under:- "13. That apart, the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Silchar had passed a fi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X