TMI Blog2018 (9) TMI 1594X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... amurugan, AC (AC) for the Respondent ORDER Per Bench The above appeal is filed against the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) who has rejected the appeal on the ground of non-compliance of predeposit. 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, ld. counsel for the appellant Ms. D. Naveen submitted that the issue involved is demand of service tax on construction of residential comp ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ce Tax, Chennai reported in 2018 (6) TMI 800 CESTAT Chennai. 3. The ld. AR Shri B. Balamurugan supported the findings in the impugned order and submitted that he matter requires to be remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals). 4. Heard both sides. 5. After hearing the submissions as well as perusal of records, we find that the Commissioner (Appeals) has dismissed the appeal for non-compliance of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|